Psychiagenia

According to TOP we only perceive a truncated image of the real nature of our world: a ‘coherent’ world (CW) ruled by string physics (Godfroid, 2003c). Our senses, as well as any technical device we may build, are braking the coherence of CW. Psychiagenia is simply the name given to the part of CW implicated in consciousness (and this means that there is no quantum computation in the brain itself (Godfroid, 2003d): only psychiagenia has this capacity).

Advertisements

From TOP (Theory of Psychiagenia) to TOE (Theory of Everything)

Ivan O.GODFROID
NeuroQuantology 2003; 3:368-369

I thank Dr. Mashour for his thoughtful comments, in particular for emphasizing the importance of the concept of a common root to both mind and brain. This is to me the key to the theory of psychiagenia (TOP).

Dr. Mashour objects to the choice of string theory as a possible solution for the mind-brain problem. He stresses that this theory is still unproven which is true, but this was already discussed in my paper (Godfroid, 2003). Moreover, the fact that string theory
might takes TOP out of the realm of neutral monism is uncertain, as the nature of the elementary string significantly differs from particles. I appreciate fully that Dr. Mashour has difficulties with the idea of counterintuitive extra-dimensions, but I assume that this is necessary to offer a new perspective to our debate. TOP surely needs experimentation, and this is my priority (Godfroid, 2003; Legros, 2003). As already stated, the placebo effect, because of its intriguing similarities with the quantum theory (e.g., unpredictability, poor reproducibility, statistics-based predictions), is an option (Godfroid, 2003; 2003b; 2003c). Finally, Dr Mashour questions the fact that in TOP psychiagenia is the investigating consciousness itself. Let me put it another way. According to TOP we only perceive a truncated image of the real nature of our world: a coherent’ world (CW) ruled by string physics (Godfroid, 2003c). Our senses, as well as any technical device we may build, are braking the coherence of CW. Psychiagenia is simply the name given to the part of CW implicated in consciousness (and this means that there is no quantum computation in the brain itself (Godfroid, 2003d): only psychiagenia has this capacity). Thus if we ever find the theory of everything (TOE), this theory should apply to CW, a united psycho-physical world and we might even name CW: Unus Mundus, as a tribute to C.G. Jung (Godfroid, 2003e).

From TOP to TOE just a good word? Let me take a last example. I am currently working on a practical implication of TOP: the Unified Psychotherapy. If the mind and the brain have a common root, this explains why either psychotherapy alone or pharmacotherapy alone is less effective than a combination of both in the treatment of mental disorders. The effectiveness of current strategies in the treatment of depression and many other psychiatric diseases is indeed clearly disappointing: up to 30 % of cases are treatment-resistant. From another point of view, all kinds of psychotherapy have the same common basis: the patient, the therapist, and the therapeutic alliance between them (Godfroid, 2003b). As a matter of fact, this is also the basis of the placebo effect, because the placebo effect is simply part of all sorts of treatment. TOP predicts the emergence of a new kind of treatment the Unified Psychotherapy (UP). UP should be pragmatic, rapidly effective, well characterized (unlike eclectic psychotherapy), intended for the majority of mental disorders, and should include pharmacotherapy. Of course I need much more place to discuss the presentation of UP, but this example shows that TOP is not purely a theoretical matter.

Acknowledgements

I thank Jean DIERKENS and Alfredo PEREIRA Jr for helpful comments, and Judy SMITH for summer technical help?.

References

Godfroid IO. Unus Mundus? A propos d’une implication philosophique de la théorie de la psychiagénie. (Submitted, 21st World Congress of Philosophy, Istanbul (Turkey), August 2003e).
Godfroid IO. Consciousness out of a Coherent’ World: New Developments from the TOP (Theory of Psychiagenia). Poster presented at the 7th Conference of the ASSC (Association for the Scientific Study of Consciousness), May 30 June 2 2003c, Memphis (Tennessee), USA.
Godfroid IO. Do the theory of psychiagenia (TOP) have experimental applications? Poster presented at the 2nd Quantum Mind Congress, March 15-19 2003,Tucson (Arizona), USA.
Godfroid IO. L’effet placebo. Un voyage à la frontière du corps et de l’esprit. Charleroi, Socrate Editions Promarex, 2003b. (Book available at http://www.amazon.fr).
Godfroid IO. No risk of a quantum decoherence in the brain according to the theory of psychiagenia (TOP). Poster presented at the 2nd Quantum Mind Congress, March 15-19 2003d, Tucson
(Arizona), USA.
Godfroid IO. Psychiagenia: a gauge theory for the mind-brain problem. NeuroQuantology 2003 ;2 :89-199.
Legros FJ, Wanson L, Godfroid IO. Libet’s Mental Timing Experiments: A Further Support to the Theory of Psychiagenia (TOP)? Poster presented at the 7th Conference of the ASSC (Association for the Scientific Study of Consciousness), May 30 June 2 2003, Memphis (Tennessee), USA.

One thought on “Psychiagenia”

  1. Psychiagenia. Preliminary results of a reanalysis of the mind and brain problem.

    The relationship between mind and brain (psychiagenia) is still poorly understood although there have been multiple attempts at conceptualising and exploring cognitive functioning over the last few years. Remarkable results are now possible, thanks to increasingly perfected brain imagery, but it only offers an indirect and truncated analysis of the psyche-soma relationship. The psychiagenia concept attempts to offer a global approach to the problem, not limiting itself to the functional cartography of the cortex. This study proposes a classification of the psychiagenian phenomena based on two axes : the one belonging or not belonging to physiology, the other relating or not relating to the external world. It is then possible to isolate four major categories : two physiological ones (selfphysiopsychiagenia and heterophysiopsychiagenia) and two pathological ones (selfpathopsychiagenia and heteropathopsychiagenia). In each one of these categories, constituting elements are distributed according to their relevance to the field of “action” or the field of “perception”. This classification presents the advantage of a complete and homogenous distribution of sometimes very different psychiagenian phenomena. It is a first step towards a systematic exploration and a global interpretation of the relationship between mind and brain.(Psychiagenia at All.Experts)

    “ Le fait qu’une proposition dite “métaphysique” soit considérée comme un phénomène psychique ne veut nullement dire que celui-ci soit “purement psychique” pour reprendre une expression favorite de mes critiques. Comme si, en employant le mot “psychique”, on constatait quelque chose de généralement connu ! Personne n’aurait-il donc encore entrevu que, lorsque nous nommons la “psyché”, nous évoquons symboliquement l’obscurité la plus épaisse que l’on puisse s’imaginer ? “

    Carl G. Jung (1941

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s